HEAD-TO-HEAD

Grip vs. Obsidian

Grip lists your SaaS apps. Obsidian shows your SOC what's happening inside them, with the evidence to act.

With Grip, there’s a lot of noise, because there's no identity integration.”

— Director Enterprise Architecture and Infrastructure, Leading North American Insurer

Why Obsidian beats Grip

Signal your SOC can act on, not noise it has to filter

Grip's discovery is inferred from email and identity. Obsidian's comes from real activity inside the apps. One fills the queue. The other empties it.

Learn more

See the real supply chain risk, not just the OAuth list

Grip inventories which integrations are connected. Obsidian shows what each integration accessed, who it affected, and where the breach radius landed.

Learn more

Close investigations in one platform, not three

Grip customers often reconstruct incidents using Zscaler, ServiceNow, or a SIEM. Obsidian ties identity, activity, and integrations together in one Knowledge Graph, so the SOC closes the incident in one place.

Learn more

Grip 101: What it does and where it falls short

Grip Security

Product summary icon

Product Summary

Grip's framework is SaaS Identity Risk Management. Strengths are shadow SaaS discovery, OAuth grant inventory, and identity-driven access governance. Grip ITDR 2.0 (June 2025) added detection of malicious OAuth grants, browser extensions, and login anomalies. The architecture is anchored in identity and email signal, with workflow automation layered on top.

Shortcomings icon

Where Grip falls short under operational pressure

  • Discovery output is noise, not decision signal. Grip's model is inferred from email and identity, not collected from activity inside the apps. Account counts can be inflated, and managed and unmanaged tenants of the same app (corporate Box vs. personal Box) aren't always distinguished. The data is difficult to use safely for user access reviews or audit.
  • Supply chain risk stops at the OAuth list. Grip lists which integrations are connected and the scopes they hold. It struggles to show what each integration is doing inside the connected apps at activity-data depth, who it affected, or how the risk spread.
  • Discovery scale outpaces governance capacity. Grip surfaces thousands of applications across SaaS and the broader web. Filtering and operationalizing that scope takes program design and ongoing tuning, which falls on the customer. Small security teams without a dedicated architect feel the burden first.
  • Findings don't close in Grip. Grip surfaces issues; remediation typically requires pivoting to ServiceNow, Zscaler, or a SIEM to investigate and to existing inline controls to enforce. Security teams running it often find themselves operating Grip as a feeder system into other tools, not as the place where SaaS incidents close.

Why teams choose Obsidian

Obsidian's Knowledge Graph ties identity, permissions, token grants, integrations, and activity together across every connected application. When a third-party vendor is compromised, Obsidian doesn't wait for the disclosure. Network effects mean that signal is already flowing across every environment we protect.

The result is faster investigations, cleaner blast radius attribution, and remediation decisions backed by what actually happened, not what could have.

Obsidian not only gives us centralized visibility but also provides insights into key areas that we simply don’t have without it. They became the obvious choice for us because of the depth in context and insights they provide across all critical areas of our SaaS ecosystem.”
We’ve saved an absolute ton of people hours through automation and data pulled from Obsidian”
Obsidian’s been able to scale with us wherever we’ve needed it to go”
You’ve revolutionized our incident response”
With Obsidian, we had all the integrations in place, ready to go, and a big catalog of threat detections out-of-the-box”

Grip Security vs. Obsidian

Least privilege icon
Running user access reviews and audit
Investigating a SaaS supply chain incident
Detecting SaaS-native threats
Closing an incident end-to-end
Standing up the program with a small team
MFA bypass detection icon
AI prompt security icon
Advanced AI-powered phishing icon
Grip Security
Inferred from email and identity; unreliable for UAR or audit evidence
Inventories OAuth grants and scopes
Identity and login anomalies
Detection and enforcement are disconnected; investigation pivots to other tools
Customer carries program design and ongoing tuning
Verified from activity inside the apps; suitable for UAR, deprovisioning, and audit
Traces each integration to identity, activity, and data movement across the SaaS stack
Behavioral detections tuned on 500+ real SaaS incident response engagements
Investigation and policy enforcement in one platform
Fast time to value with low ongoing tuning; designed for small SOC teams

Two different categories

Grip is a SaaS Identity Risk Management platform. Its center of gravity is identity sprawl: who has access, who signed up, who owns what.

Obsidian secures SaaS and AI as one system. It combines SSPM, SaaS Supply Chain Resilience, AI Security Posture Management, and Identity Threat Detection and Response in a single platform, with the visibility, runtime protection, and continuous governance to act across every application, agent, and integration. Discovery is a starting point. Obsidian is where SaaS incidents close.

Why it matters

Discovery doesn't catch the OAuth token in production that's about to disclose customer data. Security leadership at a major North American insurer reached the same conclusion, naming Obsidian as the platform to replace Grip. The breach surface lives where the activity is, not where the inventory is.

FAQs

Why Obsidian over Grip for SaaS governance and integration risk?

Grip helps teams inventory SaaS apps, OAuth grants, users, and governance status. But in head-to-head customer evaluations, inventory alone wasn’t enough: the data was noisy, usage counts were unreliable, tenants weren’t clearly separated, and reporting still had to be rebuilt for audits, access reviews, or executive updates. Obsidian gives security teams activity-backed visibility across SaaS apps, identities, integrations, and tenants, so they can see what’s actually in use, who owns it, how it’s behaving, and what needs action.

What changes when you have activity data, not just inventory?

In a SaaS supply chain incident, the SOC needs fast answers: which records were accessed, which identities were affected, how access spread, and which downstream systems were impacted. Obsidian traces the blast radius across the SaaS stack with identity-tied activity, integration context, and data movement visibility, so the SOC can investigate and contain the incident in one place.

Where does Obsidian go deeper than Grip on detection?

Grip’s detection logic is anchored in identity, login anomalies, OAuth grants, browser extensions, and governance signals. Obsidian goes deeper by detecting risky behavior inside business-critical SaaS apps, including session abuse, OAuth misuse, suspicious integration activity, identity-driven attacks, and anomalous activity at runtime. That gives customers detections grounded in what users, apps, integrations, and agents are actually doing.

How does Obsidian hold up in production compared to Grip?

Customers need SaaS governance data they can trust for access reviews, acquisition hardening, app ownership, audit evidence, and executive reporting. In head-to-head evaluations, Grip surfaced useful inventory, but customers called out noise, questionable account counts, weak tenant separation, and rough reporting. Obsidian helps security teams operationalize the program with real usage context, tenant-aware visibility, posture findings, and reporting that maps to how the business actually governs SaaS.

Why does reporting look different with Obsidian?

Obsidian helps security teams turn SaaS risk into a clear narrative for security leaders, auditors, app owners, and executives: what happened, who was involved, which tenants or apps were affected, what data or systems were exposed, and what needs to be remediated. That matters for teams managing UARs, acquisition integration, posture trends, and board-level risk reporting across multiple SaaS environments.

How does Obsidian help lean security teams move faster than Grip?

Obsidian is designed for faster time to value with low-tuning detections, production-safe connectors, prioritized findings, and investigation workflows that reduce manual effort. Security teams can move from deployment to actionable SaaS security without building the entire governance model from scratch or manually reconciling noisy inventory into something usable.

What about remediation and action workflows?

Grip includes visual workflows that can push certain configuration fixes, like re-enabling MFA or conditional access. Obsidian’s action policies surface findings, guide response, and support governance workflows today, with automated corrective action as a roadmap input from customer evaluations. The broader customer takeaway was that Obsidian delivered stronger posture context, reporting granularity, usability, and operational value.

Is Obsidian built for regulated, global environments?

99.99% uptime over the last 12 months. Regional hosting across the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Australia. Granular RBAC scoped per app. Production-safe connectors with bulk-API support. Obsidian connects to your most critical SaaS apps and collects activity data without disrupting them. Learn more about our certifications and attestations.

Where do these insights come from?

They come from real customer evaluations, including Fortune 100 and Global 2000 environments where Obsidian and Grip were evaluated head-to-head or run side-by-side.

Ready to see the difference yourself?

See what gives Obsidian the edge over others

Request a demo