Grip's discovery is inferred from email and identity. Obsidian's comes from real activity inside the apps. One fills the queue. The other empties it.
Grip inventories which integrations are connected. Obsidian shows what each integration accessed, who it affected, and where the breach radius landed.
Grip customers often reconstruct incidents using Zscaler, ServiceNow, or a SIEM. Obsidian ties identity, activity, and integrations together in one Knowledge Graph, so the SOC closes the incident in one place.
Grip's framework is SaaS Identity Risk Management. Strengths are shadow SaaS discovery, OAuth grant inventory, and identity-driven access governance. Grip ITDR 2.0 (June 2025) added detection of malicious OAuth grants, browser extensions, and login anomalies. The architecture is anchored in identity and email signal, with workflow automation layered on top.
Obsidian's Knowledge Graph ties identity, permissions, token grants, integrations, and activity together across every connected application. When a third-party vendor is compromised, Obsidian doesn't wait for the disclosure. Network effects mean that signal is already flowing across every environment we protect.
The result is faster investigations, cleaner blast radius attribution, and remediation decisions backed by what actually happened, not what could have.
Grip is a SaaS Identity Risk Management platform. Its center of gravity is identity sprawl: who has access, who signed up, who owns what.
Obsidian secures SaaS and AI as one system. It combines SSPM, SaaS Supply Chain Resilience, AI Security Posture Management, and Identity Threat Detection and Response in a single platform, with the visibility, runtime protection, and continuous governance to act across every application, agent, and integration. Discovery is a starting point. Obsidian is where SaaS incidents close.
Why it matters
Discovery doesn't catch the OAuth token in production that's about to disclose customer data. Security leadership at a major North American insurer reached the same conclusion, naming Obsidian as the platform to replace Grip. The breach surface lives where the activity is, not where the inventory is.
Grip helps teams inventory SaaS apps, OAuth grants, users, and governance status. But in head-to-head customer evaluations, inventory alone wasn’t enough: the data was noisy, usage counts were unreliable, tenants weren’t clearly separated, and reporting still had to be rebuilt for audits, access reviews, or executive updates. Obsidian gives security teams activity-backed visibility across SaaS apps, identities, integrations, and tenants, so they can see what’s actually in use, who owns it, how it’s behaving, and what needs action.
In a SaaS supply chain incident, the SOC needs fast answers: which records were accessed, which identities were affected, how access spread, and which downstream systems were impacted. Obsidian traces the blast radius across the SaaS stack with identity-tied activity, integration context, and data movement visibility, so the SOC can investigate and contain the incident in one place.
Grip’s detection logic is anchored in identity, login anomalies, OAuth grants, browser extensions, and governance signals. Obsidian goes deeper by detecting risky behavior inside business-critical SaaS apps, including session abuse, OAuth misuse, suspicious integration activity, identity-driven attacks, and anomalous activity at runtime. That gives customers detections grounded in what users, apps, integrations, and agents are actually doing.
Customers need SaaS governance data they can trust for access reviews, acquisition hardening, app ownership, audit evidence, and executive reporting. In head-to-head evaluations, Grip surfaced useful inventory, but customers called out noise, questionable account counts, weak tenant separation, and rough reporting. Obsidian helps security teams operationalize the program with real usage context, tenant-aware visibility, posture findings, and reporting that maps to how the business actually governs SaaS.
Obsidian helps security teams turn SaaS risk into a clear narrative for security leaders, auditors, app owners, and executives: what happened, who was involved, which tenants or apps were affected, what data or systems were exposed, and what needs to be remediated. That matters for teams managing UARs, acquisition integration, posture trends, and board-level risk reporting across multiple SaaS environments.
Obsidian is designed for faster time to value with low-tuning detections, production-safe connectors, prioritized findings, and investigation workflows that reduce manual effort. Security teams can move from deployment to actionable SaaS security without building the entire governance model from scratch or manually reconciling noisy inventory into something usable.
Grip includes visual workflows that can push certain configuration fixes, like re-enabling MFA or conditional access. Obsidian’s action policies surface findings, guide response, and support governance workflows today, with automated corrective action as a roadmap input from customer evaluations. The broader customer takeaway was that Obsidian delivered stronger posture context, reporting granularity, usability, and operational value.
99.99% uptime over the last 12 months. Regional hosting across the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Australia. Granular RBAC scoped per app. Production-safe connectors with bulk-API support. Obsidian connects to your most critical SaaS apps and collects activity data without disrupting them. Learn more about our certifications and attestations.
They come from real customer evaluations, including Fortune 100 and Global 2000 environments where Obsidian and Grip were evaluated head-to-head or run side-by-side.
See what gives Obsidian the edge over others