HEAD-TO-HEAD

Grip vs. Obsidian

Grip lists your SaaS apps. Obsidian shows your SOC what's happening inside them, with the evidence to act.

With Grip, there’s a lot of noise, because there's no identity integration.”

— Director Enterprise Architecture and Infrastructure, Leading North American Insurer

Why Obsidian beats Grip

Signal your SOC can act on, not noise it has to filter

Grip's discovery is inferred from email and identity. Obsidian's comes from real activity inside the apps. One fills the queue. The other empties it.

Learn more

See the real supply chain risk, not just the OAuth list

Grip inventories which integrations are connected. Obsidian shows what each integration accessed, who it affected, and where the breach radius landed.

Learn more

Close investigations in one platform, not three

Grip customers often reconstruct incidents using Zscaler, ServiceNow, or a SIEM. Obsidian ties identity, activity, and integrations together in one Knowledge Graph, so the SOC closes the incident in one place.

Learn more

Grip 101: What it does and where it falls short

Grip Security

Product summary icon

Product Summary

Grip's framework is SaaS Identity Risk Management. Strengths are shadow SaaS discovery, OAuth grant inventory, and identity-driven access governance. Grip ITDR 2.0 (June 2025) added detection of malicious OAuth grants, browser extensions, and login anomalies. The architecture is anchored in identity and email signal, with workflow automation layered on top.

Shortcomings icon

Where Grip falls short under operational pressure

  • Discovery output is noise, not decision signal. Grip's model is inferred from email and identity, not collected from activity inside the apps. Account counts can be inflated, and managed and unmanaged tenants of the same app (corporate Box vs. personal Box) aren't always distinguished. The data is difficult to use safely for user access reviews or audit.
  • Supply chain risk stops at the OAuth list. Grip lists which integrations are connected and the scopes they hold. It struggles to show what each integration is doing inside the connected apps at activity-data depth, who it affected, or how the risk spread.
  • Discovery scale outpaces governance capacity. Grip surfaces thousands of applications across SaaS and the broader web. Filtering and operationalizing that scope takes program design and ongoing tuning, which falls on the customer. Small security teams without a dedicated architect feel the burden first.
  • Findings don't close in Grip. Grip surfaces issues; remediation typically requires pivoting to ServiceNow, Zscaler, or a SIEM to investigate and to existing inline controls to enforce. Security teams running it often find themselves operating Grip as a feeder system into other tools, not as the place where SaaS incidents close.

Why teams choose Obsidian

Obsidian's Knowledge Graph ties identity, permissions, token grants, integrations, and activity together across every connected application. When a third-party vendor is compromised, Obsidian doesn't wait for the disclosure. Network effects mean that signal is already flowing across every environment we protect.

The result is faster investigations, cleaner blast radius attribution, and remediation decisions backed by what actually happened, not what could have.

Obsidian not only gives us centralized visibility but also provides insights into key areas that we simply don’t have without it. They became the obvious choice for us because of the depth in context and insights they provide across all critical areas of our SaaS ecosystem.”
We’ve saved an absolute ton of people hours through automation and data pulled from Obsidian”
Obsidian’s been able to scale with us wherever we’ve needed it to go”
You’ve revolutionized our incident response”
With Obsidian, we had all the integrations in place, ready to go, and a big catalog of threat detections out-of-the-box”

Grip Security vs. Obsidian

Least privilege icon
Running user access reviews and audit
Investigating a SaaS supply chain incident
Detecting SaaS-native threats
Closing an incident end-to-end
Standing up the program with a small team
MFA bypass detection icon
AI prompt security icon
Advanced AI-powered phishing icon
Grip Security
Inferred from email and identity; unreliable for UAR or audit evidence
Inventories OAuth grants and scopes
Identity and login anomalies
Detection and enforcement are disconnected; investigation pivots to other tools
Customer carries program design and ongoing tuning
Verified from activity inside the apps; suitable for UAR, deprovisioning, and audit
Traces each integration to identity, activity, and data movement across the SaaS stack
Behavioral detections tuned on 500+ real SaaS incident response engagements
Investigation and policy enforcement in one platform
Fast time to value with low ongoing tuning; designed for small SOC teams

Two different categories

Grip is a SaaS Identity Risk Management platform. Its center of gravity is identity sprawl: who has access, who signed up, who owns what.

Obsidian secures SaaS and AI as one system. It combines SSPM, SaaS Supply Chain Resilience, AI Security Posture Management, and Identity Threat Detection and Response in a single platform, with the visibility, runtime protection, and continuous governance to act across every application, agent, and integration. Discovery is a starting point. Obsidian is where SaaS incidents close.

Why it matters

Discovery doesn't catch the OAuth token in production that's about to disclose customer data. Security leadership at a major North American insurer reached the same conclusion, naming Obsidian as the platform to replace Grip. The breach surface lives where the activity is, not where the inventory is.

FAQs

What does Grip miss that Obsidian catches?

Grip inventories OAuth grants. Obsidian shows which grants were used, when, by whom, and whether the activity is consistent with the workflow. The inventory tells you what's possible. The activity tells you what's happening. In a head-to-head at a major North American insurer, Grip reported 9,792 accounts on a single app; the customer's security leader said the number “is not true.” Inferred usage doesn't survive contact with a UAR or an audit.

How does activity data change the outcome in a real SaaS supply chain incident?

When a third-party integration is compromised, your team needs to know which records were accessed, which identities were affected, and how far the access spread. Grip inventories the integration. Obsidian traces the full blast radius across the SaaS stack with identity-tied activity, ties it to the user or agent who triggered the access, and shows downstream impact. Those aren't the same answers.

Does Grip have the detection intelligence to catch sophisticated attacks?

Grip's detection logic is anchored in identity and login anomalies, with ITDR 2.0 extending to OAuth grants and browser extensions. That's a narrower signal than the full SaaS attack surface requires. Obsidian protects 2 of the 5 biggest US banks, the world's largest energy company, and the world's largest hospitality provider. Every real attack across that network sharpens the detections running in your environment. You're not just buying a tool. You're buying intelligence earned from the hardest targets in the world.

How does Grip hold up in a real production environment?

Grip's architecture creates fidelity gaps that compound under operational pressure: discovery noise that's difficult to filter without an identity integration, account counts that can't be relied on for user access reviews, and apps that aren't always distinguished by tenant. These aren't tuning problems. They're structural to a discovery model anchored in inferred identity, not real activity. One major North American insurer, evaluating Grip against Obsidian, concluded the platform couldn't operationalize their access review program and asked to replace Grip with Obsidian.

Does Grip's reporting hold up for enterprise stakeholders?

Grip's reporting tends to anchor in tabular inventory views. For teams reporting across tenants, ownership models, and executive audiences, that can be difficult to translate into audit evidence or executive risk briefings. Security teams reporting on multi-tenant integration health often find themselves rebuilding the narrative outside the platform.

Does Grip operationalize cleanly for small or mid-sized security teams?

Grip's model pushes governance design and ongoing tuning onto the customer. A Grip discovery in a large enterprise can surface 2,700+ applications. The customer builds the workflows, ownership model, and policy to operationalize them. Small security teams without a dedicated architect often can't absorb that overhead. Obsidian's deployment model and detection tuning are built for faster time to value, with low-tuning out of the box.

Is there anything Grip does better than Obsidian?

A global insurance brokerage that runs Obsidian for SaaS posture and ITDR evaluated Grip in 2025 and chose to stay with Obsidian. One Grip capability stood out from that evaluation worth flagging directly: Grip's visual workflow can push configuration fixes (like automatically re-enabling MFA or conditional access settings), which Obsidian's action policies currently surface but don't yet auto-execute. Aside from that one workflow capability, their Security Integration Engineer didn't find any other Grip feature compelling and described the broader experience as “a little clunky” with reporting that was “a little rough.” Their conclusion: Obsidian is “running laps around them.”

Is Obsidian built for regulated, global environments?

99.99% uptime over the last 12 months. Regional hosting across the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Australia. Granular RBAC scoped per app. Production-safe connectors with bulk-API support. Obsidian connects to your most critical SaaS apps and collects activity data without disrupting them. Learn more about our certifications and attestations.

Where do these insights come from?

99.99% uptime over the last 12 months. Regional hosting across the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Australia. Granular RBAC scoped per app. Production-safe connectors with bulk-API support. Obsidian connects to your most critical SaaS apps and collects activity data without disrupting them. Learn more about our certifications and attestations.

Ready to see the difference yourself?

See what gives Obsidian the edge over others

Request a demo