Register for our webinar on AI and the SaaS Supply chain with experts from Workday and S&P Global

ACCESS VIOLATIONS

Find and fix access violations in third-party applications

Local third-party application logins create an easy path around SSO and MFA. Spot and eliminate misconfigured access policies so every user authenticates through secure controls.

Jump To:
Challenge
Solution
Use Cases
Customer Stories
FAQ
Challenge

SSO enabled doesn't mean SSO enforced

Even with IAM in place, app owners can misconfigure settings or grant exceptions that create persistent backdoors around your controls.

Without SSO, attackers only need a stolen password to break in
Auditors levy fines and breaches are amplified when users don't use MFA
Local access lets terminated employees retain access to corporate systems
Manual review of third-party application logs makes it tough to detect access violations
78%
Of third-party applications are not behind SSO
55%
Of third-party applications that have local login access sensitive data
25%
Increase in third-party applications without SSO controls every three months
Solution

Enforce secure authentication controls across your environment

Find and eliminate every direct authentication path between users and third-party applications to enforce strict, consistent access controls through your identity perimeter.

Get a Demo

Reduce breach risk

Easily spot local access misconfigurations and SSO bypass.

Confirm offboarding

Fix misconfigurations that allow authentication by legacy accounts.

Enforce SSO and MFA

Bring every app and account in compliance with access policy.

Find shadow third-party applications

Find and secure unmanaged third-party applications and block unsanctioned apps.
Use Cases

Close every path around SSO and MFA

Related Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a direct login access violation in third-party application environments?

A direct login access violation occurs when users access third-party applications using local credentials instead of single sign-on (SSO), often bypassing intended security controls and multi-factor authentication.

Why do direct login access violations persist in organizations?

Despite SSO configuration, direct logins can persist due to legacy local accounts, break-glass credentials, misconfigured conditional access policies, and third-party applications that still allow non-SSO authentication paths.

How does Obsidian Security detect direct login violations?

Obsidian continuously monitors third-party application environments via API connections and additionally leverages visibility from its browser extension to identify evidence of local account logins. Together, these methods ensure real-time, high-fidelity detection.

What operational challenges arise from manual detection of access violations?

Manual reviews require correlating third-party applications, IdP, and network logs, interviewing users, and collecting evidence, leading to high operational costs and delays in detecting and responding to security incidents.

What are the risks of undetected direct login access?

Persistent violations increase compliance risk, raise operational costs, weaken incident response times, and decrease confidence among customers and auditors.

How does Obsidian improve access policy enforcement compared to traditional methods?

Obsidian automates the detection of policy drift in real time and provides clear evidence for remediation, reducing reliance on periodic manual reviews and minimizing unnoticed violations.

Why is it important to distinguish between SSO and direct login in access logs?

Knowing the difference helps teams quickly identify unauthorized access routes, prevent MFA bypass, and ensure only approved authentication methods are used.