Register for our webinar on AI and the SaaS Supply chain with experts from Workday and S&P Global

BREACH CLARITY

Prove breach impact across SaaS

SaaS breaches force a race to prove scope and impact. Get investigation-ready evidence to confirm what was accessed, where activity stopped, and make defensible disclosure decisions fast.

Jump To:
ChallengeSolutionUse CasesCustomer StoriesFAQ
Challenge

SaaS breaches demand decisions before evidence is complete

SaaS fragmentation leaves responders unable to determine breach scope and impact when needed.

  • Evidence of data access is fragmented across SaaS apps, identities, and integrations
  • IdP visibility stops at authentication, not in-app actions
  • Access persists through tokens and integrations after compromise
  • Key evidence is buried with admins and app owners

6 mins

Attack-to-exfiltration can happen in minutes, leaving little time to respond

251 days

Identify and contain cloud breaches

$400M

Estimated profit impact for M&S while scope and impact were unclear

Solution

Get defensible breach clarity for SaaS

Unify SaaS evidence, resolve actions to real identities, and reconstruct attacker timelines so responders can prove scope and impact fast, without SIEM stitching.

GET A DEMO

Unified breach evidence

See SaaS activity, access changes, sessions, tokens, and integrations across connected apps in one investigation view.

Identity-resolved investigations

Link accounts, sessions, and OAuth tokens back to the real human identity and privilege context behind the activity.

Less manual investigation work

Automatic breach timelines across apps to cut manual log stitching, exports, and reconstruction.

Lower total cost of ownership

Reduce SIEM ingest and custom pipeline burden without slowing investigations or losing coverage.

Use Cases

Get complete breach clarity across SaaS

Reconstruct attacker activity across SaaS identities, access paths, and data.

Up to 75%

faster MTTI

Determine material impact without guesswork or overreach.

Cut SIEM spend by up to

90%

Customer stories

View all customer stories →

Resources to help you assess and respond to SaaS breaches

Frequently asked questions

How does Obsidian reconstruct attacker timelines across SaaS?

Obsidian's Knowledge Graph normalizes activity from your IdP and SaaS apps into a single investigation view. It resolves accounts and sessions back to identities, connects access events to data objects, and shows you what happened across apps; no manual log stitching required.

What makes SaaS breach investigation different from traditional forensics?

In SaaS, identities and data span multiple platforms, each with different log formats and visibility gaps. Identity-based attacks bypass perimeter controls entirely. Traditional tools force you to manually collect and correlate logs from each app. Obsidian provides centralized visibility with identity resolution and normalized context already built in, so you can pivot immediately.

Can Obsidian help determine if an incident meets disclosure thresholds?

Yes. Obsidian shows exactly which data was accessed, modified, or shared—and where attacker activity stopped. That evidence lets you make confident, defensible decisions under regulatory deadlines instead of disclosing broadly out of uncertainty.

How does Obsidian help avoid over-disclosure?

By proving what was accessed and where activity stopped, teams can avoid broad assumptions and reduce unnecessary disclosure or escalation driven by uncertainty.

How does Obsidian detect OAuth token abuse and session hijacking?

Obsidian baselines normal activity for each identity, then flags unusual token or session use based on location, context, and behavior. Investigators can see session origin, authentication method, and activity patterns to separate legitimate use from hijacked access.

What SaaS apps does Obsidian support for breach investigation?

Obsidian provides forensic visibility across Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta, and dozens of other apps. Activity is normalized into a single timeline so you can investigate across platforms without switching tools.

How quickly can teams conduct breach investigations with Obsidian?

Customers reduce investigation timelines from days to minutes. You can pivot across identities, sessions, and data events immediately. That means, no waiting on SIEM ingestion or building custom correlation queries.

Why not use a SIEM for SaaS breach investigations?

Platforms like AppOmni and Valence tend to forward security events to a SIEM—they don't store stateful SaaS activity themselves. That means you're paying egress costs, SIEM ingest costs, and engineering time to build parsing rules and queries. Obsidian stores SaaS activity natively with identity and permission context pre-normalized. Investigators pivot across apps, sessions, and data events immediately.

How do you distinguish legitimate SaaS activity from abuse of a hijacked session?

Obsidian baselines normal behavior for each identity; location, access patterns, token usage. When a session deviates, you see the authentication method, origin, and behavioral anomalies in context. That makes it clear when legitimate credentials are being used maliciously.