Head-to-Head

AppOmni vs. Obsidian

AppOmni flags posture findings. Obsidian shows what each identity did, with the activity evidence to act.

With AppOmni you build and run Splunk queries that can take 72 hours and pray to find interesting insights."

— Security Leader, Fortune 100 Bank

Why Obsidian beats AppOmni

Posture findings, with the activity evidence underneath

AppOmni flags what's misconfigured. Obsidian shows what each identity did with that misconfiguration. Who acted, what data moved, where the blast radius landed. Findings you can close, not just open.

Learn more

Threat detection in-platform, not in a SIEM

Deeper investigation in AppOmni routes through SIEM: export the data, build the queries, wait. Obsidian's OAuth and identity threat detection runs in-platform on native activity data, tuned across 500+ real IR engagements. Hours, not days.

Learn more

Enterprise workflow, not just feature coverage

Multi-tenant visibility across hundreds of Salesforce instances. Fine-grained RBAC for safe app-owner access. Mature connectors for regulated, global environments. Where SSPM ends, security operations begin.

Learn more

AppOmni 101: What it does and where it falls short

AppOmni

Product summary icon

Product Summary

AppOmni is an SSPM platform: configuration-drift detection, baseline posture rules, compliance mapping, and access governance across core SaaS apps. The design center is posture — finding what's misconfigured across Salesforce, M365, Workday, ServiceNow, and the rest. Threat detection and UEBA are packaged on top, but the deeper investigation work tends to route through SIEM.

Shortcomings icon

Where AppOmni falls short under operational pressure:

  • Posture findings, not investigation answers. AppOmni shows you what's misconfigured. When the next question is whether the misconfiguration was actually used, by whom, what data moved, the workflow routes through SIEM. Export the data. Build the queries. Wait.
  • SIEM dependency drives TCO past the contract. Customers running AppOmni at scale report significant Splunk infrastructure costs to support the investigation workflow. In one Fortune 10 environment, that came to roughly $1.2M in Splunk infrastructure alone. You pay AppOmni, then pay again to get the answer.
  • Enterprise workflow shows gaps at scale. Multi-tenant visibility across hundreds of Salesforce instances. RBAC fine-grained enough that app owners can act without security gatekeeping every request. Cross-tenant reporting and navigation. These show up as concrete gaps in large financial-services and global enterprise environments.
  • Integration risk stops at the OAuth list. AppOmni inventories integrations and scopes. Tracing what each integration actually accessed, who triggered it, and where the blast radius landed across the SaaS estate sits outside the posture model.

Why teams choose Obsidian

Obsidian keeps identity, permissions, token grants, integrations, and SaaS activity connected in one stateful Knowledge Graph. This delivers posture with evidence and investigation-ready answers directly in the platform.

Instead of exporting data and rebuilding context in a SIEM, teams can prove risk, reduce privilege, remove unused or abused integrations, and respond faster. The result is lower operational overhead, lower total cost of ownership, and security decisions backed by concrete evidence rather than assumptions.

Obsidian not only gives us centralized visibility but also provides insights into key areas that we simply don’t have without it. They became the obvious choice for us because of the depth in context and insights they provide across all critical areas of our SaaS ecosystem.”
We’ve saved an absolute ton of people hours through automation and data pulled from Obsidian”
Obsidian’s been able to scale with us wherever we’ve needed it to go”
You’ve revolutionized our incident response”
With Obsidian, we had all the integrations in place, ready to go, and a big catalog of threat detections out-of-the-box”
Illustration comparing AppOmni and Obsidian SaaS security platforms, highlighting their key features with a VS symbol in the center.

AppOmni vs. Obsidian

Least privilege icon
Posture with evidence
OAuth and threat detection
SaaS supply chain
Enterprise workflow
Total cost of ownership
MFA bypass detection icon
AI prompt security icon
Advanced AI-powered phishing icon
AppOmni
Flags misconfigurations and posture state
Some signal in-platform; deeper investigation routes through SIEM
Inventories integrations and scopes
Posture views; RBAC and multi-tenant scale come up as concrete gaps in large environments
Platform plus SIEM-driven investigation workflow
Identity-linked activity evidence behind every finding: who accessed, when, what data moved
OAuth and identity threat detection in-platform, tuned across 500+ real IR engagements
Maps each integration's actual reach, who triggered it, and the blast radius across the SaaS estate
Multi-tenant visibility, fine-grained RBAC, mature connectors for regulated global environments
One platform; activity data and detections in-platform, no SIEM dependency

Deep SaaS integrations that show real risk

Two different bets on SaaS security

AppOmni is built around posture. SSPM, configuration drift, baseline policy, compliance mapping. The bet is that surfacing what's misconfigured is the highest-value SaaS security job, and the rest of the operational picture lives in SIEM and adjacent tools.

Obsidian secures SaaS and AI as one system. It combines SSPM, SaaS Supply Chain Resilience, AI Security Posture Management, and Identity Threat Detection and Response in a single platform, with the visibility, runtime protection, and continuous governance to act across every application, agent, and integration. The bet: posture alone isn't enough. Investigation needs identity-linked activity. Integration risk needs to map real reach. Threat detection needs to fire on actual behavior, not require a SIEM detour.

AppOmni surfaces findings. Obsidian closes them.

Why it matters

Posture is necessary. It's not sufficient. When a misconfiguration becomes an incident, the question becomes operational: who acted, what data moved, where did the blast radius land. Answering that without native activity data means routing through SIEM, with significant infrastructure costs and investigation cycles measured in days. Obsidian's behavioral detections are tuned on 500+ real SaaS incident response engagements, with identity-linked activity behind every finding. Findings close in the platform that opened them.

FAQs

We already have AppOmni. Why switch?

Posture is necessary; it's not sufficient. AppOmni surfaces what's misconfigured. The investigation work that closes findings — who exploited it, what data moved, where the blast radius landed — routes through SIEM. Obsidian gives you posture plus the activity data underneath, in one platform. The TCO conversation usually settles it.

How does Obsidian handle SaaS supply chain risk differently from AppOmni?

AppOmni inventories which integrations are connected and the OAuth scopes they hold. The harder questions live one layer deeper: what each integration actually accessed, who triggered it, where the blast radius landed across the SaaS estate when it ran. That's the SaaS supply chain attack pattern (Snowflake, Drift, Salesforce Data Loader), and posture inventories don't catch it. Obsidian maps the active behavior behind each integration, not just its existence.

We're a Microsoft-centric environment. Doesn't AppOmni cover that well enough?

AppOmni handles posture across M365 and Entra. The gap shows up when Microsoft-centric enterprises start enabling SaaS-to-SaaS integrations and AI agents reaching across applications: what Copilot can access, what an OAuth-connected vendor app actually moved, what an Agentforce integration touched once it ran. That's a different platform job than M365 configuration governance, and it's where Microsoft-heavy enterprises tend to add Obsidian.

AppOmni is strong on Salesforce. Doesn't that cover the biggest risk?

Salesforce posture is one piece. The harder enterprise questions: cross-tenant visibility across hundreds of Salesforce instances, fine-grained RBAC so app owners can act without security gatekeeping every request, what each identity did inside each tenant, what an integration moved when invoked. That's where AppOmni at multi-tenant scale tends to show enterprise limits.

What about shadow SaaS, browser extensions, and Integration Risk Management?

AppOmni's discovery works through its connector and platform integrations. Obsidian adds browser telemetry that captures what employees actually use outside the IdP, and identity-linked IRM that maps where OAuth integrations reach across the SaaS estate. In one recent head-to-head, browser-extension visibility plus IRM was the deciding factor — the gap a connector-based discovery model wasn't built to close.

We need SSPM for compliance. Is Obsidian enough on its own?

Obsidian covers SaaS compliance, plus SaaS Supply Chain Resilience, plus AISPM, plus ITDR, in one platform. Every posture finding carries identity-linked activity evidence underneath, so app owners can act on proof, not just flags. SSPM is the floor, not the ceiling.

Is Obsidian built for regulated, global environments?

99.99% uptime over the last 12 months. Regional hosting across the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Australia. Granular RBAC scoped per app. Production-safe connectors with bulk-API support. Obsidian connects to your most critical SaaS apps and collects activity data without disrupting them. Learn more about our certifications and attestations.

Where do these insights come from?

These aren't AI-generated summaries. They come from real customers — including Fortune 100 and Global 2000 environments — where Obsidian and AppOmni were evaluated head-to-head.

Ready to see the difference yourself?

See what gives Obsidian the edge over others

Request a demo