User Experience: Versu vs Competitors

User experience comparison of Versu

Features comparison

Least privilege
Data exposure verification
SaaS supply chain risk management
Token misuse & compromise
Insider risk detection
Supply chain & OAuth threat detection and incident response
MFA bypass detection
AI prompt security
Advanced AI-powered phishing
Competitor A
Enforcing least privilege access to sensitive data.
Regular checks to verify data exposure risks.
Tools to manage risks in SaaS environments.
Monitoring for potential token misuse.
Detection of insider threats through analytics.
Incident response for OAuth-related threats.
Detection systems for MFA bypass attempts.
AI-enhanced security measures.
Advanced phishing detection capabilities.
Competitor B
Strict access controls to minimize risk.
Regular audits to ensure data integrity.
Robust tools for managing supply chain vulnerabilities.
Advanced monitoring to detect token misuse.
Proactive measures to identify insider threats.
Real-time detection and response to OAuth threats.
Sophisticated systems to prevent MFA bypass attempts.
Utilizing AI to enhance security protocols.
Cutting-edge AI tools to combat phishing attacks.
Obsidian Logo
Least privilege
Data exposure verification
SaaS supply chain risk management
Token misuse & compromise
Insider risk detection
Supply chain & OAuth threat detection and incident response
MFA bypass detection
AI prompt security
Advanced AI-powered phishing
User Experience Report

Powerful integrations, zero hassle

Competitors analysis

Competitor A

Product Summary

Comprehensive cybersecurity solutions.

Use Cases

  • RMM:

    Safeguarding financial transactions.

  • PSA:

    Protecting patient data in healthcare.

  • Patch management:

    Ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

  • Network discovery:

    Mitigating risks in digital marketing.

Shortcomings

  • Inconsistent customer service:

    High costs for premium features.

  • Limited integrations:

    Complex setup process.

  • Patch management issues:

    Requires ongoing user training.

  • Scarce network monitoring options:

    Limited support for older systems.

Competitor B

Product Summary

Advanced cybersecurity solutions.

Use Cases

  • RMM:

    Protecting sensitive customer data in financial services.

  • PSA:

    Securing healthcare information against breaches.

  • Patch management:

    Ensuring compliance with data protection regulations.

  • Network discovery:

    Mitigating risks in cloud-based applications.

Shortcomings

  • Inconsistent customer service:

    High initial setup costs for advanced features.

  • Limited integrations:

    Complex integration with existing systems.

  • Patch management issues:

    Requires ongoing training for staff.

  • Scarce network monitoring options:

    Limited support for legacy systems.

Headshot of Mario Duarte from Snowflake

Snowflake has hundreds of SaaS applications — to gain visibility into those SaaS applications could take months. With Obsidian we were able to do that in days, if not hours.

Mario Duarte, Vice President of Security, Snowflake

Headshot of Heather Akuiyibo from Databricks

Our partnership with Obsidian as a Built on Databricks Partner underscores a joint commitment to offer our customers a secure and unified platform for data, analytics and AI, that empowers fast and powerful insights.

Heather Akuiyibo, VP Go-To-Market, Databricks

Headshot of Øyvind Berget from Norma Cyber

Seeing threats across SaaS solutions in a single pane of view is critical to us. Obsidian promises always-on monitoring and protection, and meets the compliance standards that our members need to operate seamlessly.

Øyvind Berget, Chief Technical Officer, Norma Cyber

Why customers choose us over other competitors?

Obsidian Security helps organizations detect and minimize GenAI risks, enabling safe and responsible use across the business.

With the Obsidian browser extension, we’ve got a lot of insight of how users are interacting with things like generative AI SaaS solutions out there, potentially going after what documents may be being uploaded.”
Brad Jones,
Chief Information security Officer, Snowflake